The Need for Basic Rights

A Critique of Nozick’s Entitlement Theory

Authors

Keywords:

Nozick’s Entitlement Theory, Libertarianism, entitlement theory

Abstract

Although the Libertarian Party has gained traction as the third biggest political party in the United States, the philosophical grounding of the party, which is exemplified by Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory, is inherently flawed. Libertarianism’s emphasis on a free market leads to gross inequalities since it has no regard for sacred rights other than one’s right to freedom from interference from the government beyond what is essential for societal functioning. I argue that Nozick’s entitlement theory leads to indirect injustice and is therefore an unfitting philosophical theory, which means that the Libertarian Party’s platform is flawed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Shue, H. (1980). Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
The Need for Basic Rights: A Critique of Nozick’s Entitlement Theory

Downloads

Published

10-10-2014

How to Cite

Rentmeester, C. (2014). The Need for Basic Rights: A Critique of Nozick’s Entitlement Theory. SOCRATES, 2(3), 18–26. Retrieved from https://www.socratesjournal.com/index.php/SOCRATES/article/view/9