Main Article Content
The Paper argues for the synthesis of the Internalism and Externalism theory of justification. It is the opinion of the paper that since both internalist and externalists legitimately seeks the epistemic quest for certainty, both are important epistemologically. Moreso, since both Internalism and Externalism define issues that must be addressed in a theory of knowledge, they can and should be understood as compatible doctrines. Against all positions of non-compatibility, the paper holds that the compatibility of both internalism and externalism is logically strengthened. As a matter of fact both should not be view as “Contradictory” but as “Sub –contraries”. Finally, the paper proposed a guide to, even in its crudeness, resolving the Internalism and Externalism debate: A hybrid of internalism and externalism.
Revised Copyright/CC license that applies to all the articles published after 05-02-2017
Copyright/CC license that applies to all the articles published before 05-02-2017
Author(s) will retain all the right except commercial and re-publishing rights. In the case of re-publishing, they will have to obtain written permission from the journal. Additional licensing agreements (Creative Commons licenses) grants rights to readers to copy, distribute, display and perform the work as long as you give the original author(s) credit, they can not use the works for commercial purposes and are not allowed to alter, transform, or build upon the work. For any reuse or distribution, readers and users must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holders. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the authors’ rights. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
Research Papers published in SOCRATES are licensed under an Attribution -NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Audi, R. (1988). Belief, Justification, and Knowledge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bergmann, M. (2006) Justification without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
Bloomfield, P. (2000) “Virtue Epistemology and the Epistemology of Virtue” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. LX, 1.
Bonjour, L& Sosa, E. (2001). Epistemic Justification M.A: BlackWall.
Bonjour, L. (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,.
Chisholm, R. (1988) “The Indispensability of Internal Justification” Synthese;64, 207-217
Code, L. (1991). What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Itacha, NY: Cornell University Press
Geddes G, & David D (2003) English Thesaurus Synonyms Dictionary. Dale House, Scotland.
Foley, R. (1988) “Epistemic Justification”. Routledge Philosophy of Encyclopedia, Version 1.0 London and New York: Routledge.
Kim, K. (1993) “Internalism/ Externalism in Epistemology”. APQ 3. No.4. Pg 136
Lacewing, M. (2008) Internalist and Externalist Theories of Justification. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group .